Like a fish caught by the mouth, former Health Secretary Francisco Duque III revealed what many had already guessed, but dared not say: that then-President Rodrigo Duterte had ordered the transfer of P47.6 billion from the coffers of the Department of Health (DOH) to the Procurement Service of the Department of Budget and Management (PS-DBM), supposedly to procure COVID-19 supplies at the height of the pandemic.
As bombshells go, it wasn’t exactly earth-shattering, but one that gave clarity to lingering questions on the political firestorm that rocked the country two years ago. That fateful order—a presidential directive as it now appears—was the “original sin” believed to have set the stage for the anomalous deal of plunderous proportions.
The presidential order allowed a little-known company called Pharmally Pharmaceutical Corp., with a paid-up capital of P625,000, to corner pandemic contracts worth billions of pesos as facilitated by PS-DBM. All told, Pharmally would secure, between March 2020 and July 2021, deals that totaled P11 billion to supply DOH with personal protective equipment sets, face masks, face shields, COVID-19 test kits, and other medical items.
Duque made his disclosure during the June 3 oversight hearing of the House appropriations committee. Said Duque: “Publicly, the order to transfer funds from [DOH to PS-DBM] was made by the President in our weekly meetings or Talk to the People [program].”
It was the first categorical statement from any official, past or present, that linked the former president to the transfer of health funds to PS-DBM, headed then by former budget undersecretary Lloyd Christopher Lao.
But it wasn’t the first time such a claim was made.
On Feb. 1, 2022, the draft committee report released by then Sen. Richard Gordon who chaired the Senate blue ribbon panel, had stated that Duterte “admittedly ordered the transfer of P42 billion of DOH funds to PS-DBM for the purchase of supplies for use against COVID-19.
The claim, however, had no solid footing, since it was predicated on Duterte’s admission on Aug. 31, 2021, that he ordered Duque to skirt established bidding processes. “I was the one who said, ‘I am sure there is a law which would exempt you from bidding’,” the former president had said. Duterte had never otherwise confessed to his role in the transfer of funds, until his health secretary let the cat out of the bag two years later.
On June 4, however, Duque hastily tried to take back his revelation by issuing a clarification that he had been “regrettably taken out of context” in media reports.
Yet there was no denial in his words, only empty justifications. In fact, Duque’s concluding sentence only reaffirmed what he had told the House panel earlier—that Duterte “gave his approval to course the procurement of said items through the PS-DBM.”
Duque’s ambivalence is not surprising, torn as he must be between the obligation to defend his former boss, and the instinct to protect his own hide.
Recall that on May 8 this year, the Office of the Ombudsman named Duque and Lao as respondents in a graft complaint in connection with what the Ombudsman described as the “illegal transfer” of some P41.46 billion in funds from the DOH to PS-DBM from March to December 2020, presumably the same amount linked to Duterte’s order. The Ombudsman’s resolution said Duque and Lao “acted with evident bad faith or gross, inexcusable negligence,” with their wrongdoing “highlighted by the fact that the illegal fund transfers occurred amid a national health emergency where respondents were expected to be more prudent and diligent in handling people’s money.”
Though not quite a smoking gun, Duque’s disclosure swung the culpability in his former boss’ direction, under the principle of command responsibility.
When asked about Duque’s admission, all the former president could say was he couldn’t remember. “Maybe what I said is, ‘go ahead’,” one newspaper report quoted him as saying. “I could not recall, for the life of me. Maybe what you are saying is true.”
Such excuse is nothing new for Duterte, so it is now up to the Ombudsman to compel him to recall his exact role in the still unraveling Pharmally scandal. Was he complicit or only negligent since the grossly disadvantageous contracts were consummated under his nose?
Then again, would Ombudsman Samuel Martires, a Duterte appointee, find the gumption to indict the former president for the same offenses his office had ruled against Duque and Lao?
Now, do you reward politicians who has the audacity to loot the people's money in times of pandemic by electing the same old corrupt politicians into office. Or, can you find the courage to Love Your Country over Corrupt Political Clans you previously supported and loved.
Based on their financial statements, the confidential spending of the seven wealthiest cities in the country in 2023 only amounts to P529.5 million in total – lower than Davao City's P530 million
MANILA, Philippines – Davao City’s confidential funds spending for 2023 was higher than the confidential expenses of the seven wealthiest cities in the country combined.
Under Mayor Sebastian Duterte, the Dutertes’ home turf spent P530 million in 2023, based on the Davao City government’s financial statements submitted to the Commission on Audit (COA). The 2023 expenses were P70 million or 15.22% higher compared to 2022’s P460 million.
Based on their financial statements, the confidential spending of the seven wealthiest cities in the country in 2023 only amounted to P529.5 million in total. Their individual spending was as follows:
For the fourth straight year, Quezon City was the Philippines’ wealthiest city in terms of assets, based on COA’s annual financial report on local government units for 2023. It had P448.51 billion in total assets, followed by Makati with P243.44 billion. The country’s capital, Manila, was at the third spot with P85.92 billion. This is why it is important for this political clan to divert your attention to other issues so they can continue using 'Confidential Funds' for personal gain.
What did all that money actually produce for the Filipino people, how did the ordinary citizen benefited from Confidential Funds?
It was simply used to justify manufactured spending report to divert the people's money to unknown and unsubstantiated destination. The only accomplishment we hear out of these confidential funds was to identify their political opponents as 'NPA'. This is the reason for creating a fake enemy (a.k.a. NPA) or fake war on drugs, to divert these funds to unknown accounts. It's time for the Filipino people to demand transparency and accountability from our leaders.
A Stunning Press Conference Loaded with Grievances, Victim Role Playing, and Threats of Assassinations Directed Towards the President, First Lady, and Speaker of the House, while Ignoring Questions Posed by the Quad Committees with regards to Confidential Funds.
The congress has to decide now what to do with these evidences of misuse or plunder of confidential funds. What I find interesting is, some lawmakers are suggesting that there is no time for a remedy or impeachment. Even the current President suggested that it will not help a single filipino by making the vice president accountable for her actions. This is equivalent to a family discovering they are being looted and the looters are still in the house. And the father's response is, "it's late in the night and we should all go back to sleep".
I find it astonishing that a remedy is not necessary because there is no time. At the end of the day, it is the filipino people that will suffer from any inaction with regards to making the vice president accountable for her actions. It is sad to know that political clans are simply taking turns in looting the filipino people of their tax money.
Vice President Chief of Staff Extremely Evasive after House Panel Discovers Her Letter asking COA not to share to Quad Committees Documents Relating to Disbursement of Confidential Funds.
Atty. Zuleika Lopez, chief of staff of the Office of the Vice President, was cited in contempt and ordered detained by a House panel on Wednesday (November 20) for "undue interference" over a letter requesting the Commission on Audit to not comply with the subpoena issued by the committee.
Confronted with the letter, Lopez explained to the House Committee on Public Order and Safety that it was simply a "respectful request" to the COA, and that she had "no intention to demand or order them to do something they didn't want to do." Despite Lopez's apology and plea for the contempt citation to be reconsidered, ACT Teachers Party-list Rep. France Castro did not withdraw her motion.
MARIA RESSA: Considered as Enemy of the State by the Previous Administration to Harvard Commencement Speaker in 2024
It's time to have the courage to hold people in power into account because the future of your children is more importantthan any political figure you supported and loved before.